Eusebius: Ecclesiastical History, Books I–X

Chapter XXXVIII.—The Epistle of Clement and the Writings falsely ascribed to him.

1. Thus Ignatius has done in the epistles which we have mentioned, ^{Edition note 1} and Clement in his epistle which is accepted by all, and which he wrote in the name of the church of Rome to the church of Corinth. ^{Edition note 2} In this epistle he gives many thoughts drawn from the Epistle to the Hebrews, and also quotes verbally some of its expressions, thus showing most plainly that it is not a recent production.

2. Wherefore it has seemed reasonable to reckon it with the other writings of the apostle. For as Paul had written to the Hebrews in his native tongue, some say that the evangelist Luke, others that this Clement himself, translated the epistle.

3. The latter seems more probable, because the epistle of Clement and that to the Hebrews have a similar character in regard to style, and still further because the thoughts contained in the two works are not very different. ^{Edition note 3}

4. But it must be observed also that there is said to be a second epistle of Clement. But we do not know that this is recognized like the former, for we do not find that the ancients have made any use of it. ^{Edition note 4}

5. And certain men have lately brought forward other wordy and lengthy writings under his name, containing dialogues of Peter and Apion. ^{Edition note 5} But no mention has been made of these by the ancients; for they do not even preserve the pure stamp of apostolic orthodoxy. The acknowledged writing of Clement is well known. We have spoken also of the works of Ignatius and Polycarp. ^{Edition note 6}